HISTORY - Page 26

In other words, the opportunity for research was small, and ABMA felt that NAA's engine was only marginal for the JUPITER program 34 . Be that as it may, this was the situation ABMA faced in 1956. In getting the Army-Navy program under way, operational priority goals were established. The first was to comply with the DOD directive to design a basic  missile that was responsive to land and sea requirements. A second represented the desires of DOD and the State Department, and that was the  demonstration of the capability to fire a ballistic missile to a range greater than 1,000 nautical miles. From first appearances, it seemed that parallel development was the obvious course to follow, but the Army and Navy soon realized that there were not enough technically qualified personnel available to pursue this dual program. In fact, they aligned their program to the basic design, an early operational capability, and, then, the long- range shot. As a  note of interest, on 20 September 1956, a JUPITER C attained an altitude of 682 St miles and a range of 3,335 St miles, shattering all existing records at  that time in both categories. This flight admirably satisfied DOD and State Department requirements 35 . One of the first orders of business, after the February 1958 activation, was to update the development. Several substantial changes were made. For  example, in November 1955 it had been planned to start with a 65-foot missile and, then, gradually reduce the length, but the Navy requested that the  missile be as short as possible. So the previous plan was abandoned, and the development program was to aim for a 55- foot missile with a 105-inch  diameter (10 inches greater than had been planned). At the outset the Army ______________________________
34. Present, undated, subj: Need for a Fair Competitive Position Bet IRBM #1 & IRBM #2. Hist Off files; Ltr, WDD to ABMA, undated, subject: North American Engines for Dellivery During CY 1957, in ABMA Ref Book, subj: JUP, Part I, Tab D. 35. JUP Dev Plan, FY 1958, 29 Sep 56.35. JUP Dev Plan, FY 1958, 29 Sep 56.
Back Back Forward Forward
Made with Xara

HISTORY - Page 26

In other words, the opportunity for research was small, and ABMA felt that NAA's engine was only marginal for the JUPITER program 34 . Be that as it may, this was the situation ABMA faced in 1956. In getting the Army-Navy program under way, operational priority goals were established. The first was to comply with the DOD directive to design a basic  missile that was responsive to land and sea requirements. A second represented the desires of DOD and the State Department, and that was the  demonstration of the capability to fire a ballistic missile to a range greater than 1,000 nautical miles. From first appearances, it seemed that parallel development was the obvious course to follow, but the Army and Navy soon realized that there were not enough technically qualified personnel available to pursue this dual program. In fact, they aligned their program to the basic design, an early operational capability, and, then, the long-range shot. As a  note of interest, on 20 September 1956, a JUPITER C attained an altitude of 682 St miles and a range of 3,335 St miles, shattering all existing records at  that time in both categories. This flight admirably satisfied DOD and State Department requirements 35 . One of the first orders of business, after the February 1958 activation, was to update the development. Several substantial changes were made. For  example, in November 1955 it had been planned to start with a 65-foot missile and, then, gradually reduce the length, but the Navy requested that the  missile be as short as possible. So the previous plan was abandoned, and the development program was to aim for a 55-foot missile with a 105-inch  diameter (10 inches greater than had been planned). At the outset the Army ______________________________
34. Present, undated, subj: Need for a Fair Competitive Position Bet IRBM #1 & IRBM #2. Hist Off files; Ltr, WDD to ABMA, undated, subject: North American Engines for Dellivery During CY 1957, in ABMA Ref Book, subj: JUP, Part I, Tab D. 35. JUP Dev Plan, FY 1958, 29 Sep 56.35. JUP Dev Plan, FY 1958, 29 Sep 56.
Back Back Forward Forward